Content On This Page | ||
---|---|---|
Mid-Point Theorem for Triangles: Statement and Proof | Converse of the Mid-Point Theorem | Applications of the Mid-Point Theorem |
Mid-Point Theorem
Mid-Point Theorem for Triangles: Statement and Proof
The Mid-Point Theorem (MPT) is a significant theorem in Euclidean Geometry that describes a specific relationship between a line segment connecting the midpoints of two sides of a triangle and the third side of that triangle.
Statement
The line segment joining the mid-points of any two sides of a triangle is:
- Parallel to the third side.
- Half the length of the third side.
Proof

Given:
A triangle $\triangle ABC$.
E is the mid-point of side $\overline{AB}$, so $AE = EB$.
F is the mid-point of side $\overline{AC}$, so $AF = FC$.
To Prove:
- $\overline{EF} \parallel \overline{BC}$
- $EF = \frac{1}{2} BC$
Construction:
Extend the line segment $\overline{EF}$ to a point D such that $EF = FD$. Join point C to point D.
Proof:
Consider $\triangle AEF$ and $\triangle CDF$.
AF = FC
(Given, F is the mid-point of AC)
$\angle AFE = \angle CFD$
(Vertically opposite angles)
EF = FD
(By Construction)
Therefore, by the SAS (Side-Angle-Side) congruence criterion:
$\triangle AEF \cong \triangle CDF$
Since the triangles are congruent, their corresponding parts are equal by CPCT (Corresponding Parts of Congruent Triangles).
AE = CD
(CPCT) ... (1)
$\angle EAF = \angle DCF$
(CPCT) ... (2)
We are given that E is the mid-point of $\overline{AB}$.
AE = EB
(Given)
From equation (1) and the fact that $AE = EB$, we have:
EB = CD
Now consider equation (2), $\angle EAF = \angle DCF$. These angles can be viewed as alternate interior angles formed by the transversal $\overline{AC}$ intersecting lines $\overline{AB}$ (containing segment $\overline{AE}$) and $\overline{DC}$.
Since the alternate interior angles are equal, the lines must be parallel:
AB $\parallel$ DC
Since $\overline{EB}$ is a part of the line $\overline{AB}$, we can say:
EB $\parallel$ DC
Now, consider the quadrilateral EBCD. We have shown that:
- One pair of opposite sides, $\overline{EB}$ and $\overline{CD}$, are equal ($EB = CD$).
- The same pair of opposite sides, $\overline{EB}$ and $\overline{DC}$, are parallel ($EB \parallel DC$).
A quadrilateral in which one pair of opposite sides is both equal and parallel is a parallelogram.
Therefore, EBCD is a parallelogram.
Since EBCD is a parallelogram, its other pair of opposite sides must also be equal and parallel.
Thus, $\overline{ED} \parallel \overline{BC}$ and $ED = BC$.
From $ED \parallel BC$, and knowing that $\overline{EF}$ is a part of the line segment $\overline{ED}$, we can conclude that:
$\overline{EF} \parallel \overline{BC}$
(This proves the first part of the theorem)
Also, $ED = BC$. From our construction, the line segment $\overline{ED}$ is formed by extending $\overline{EF}$ such that $EF = FD$. Thus, $ED = EF + FD$.
Since $EF = FD$, we have $ED = EF + EF = 2EF$.
Substituting this into the equation $ED = BC$:
2EF = BC
Dividing both sides by 2, we get:
$EF = \frac{1}{2} BC$
(This proves the second part of the theorem)
Hence, the Mid-Point Theorem is proved: the line segment joining the mid-points of two sides of a triangle is parallel to the third side and is half the length of the third side.
Converse of the Mid-Point Theorem
The Converse of the Mid-Point Theorem is a crucial theorem that complements the original Mid-Point Theorem. It provides a method to prove that a point is the midpoint of a side of a triangle under specific conditions.
Statement
The line drawn through the mid-point of one side of a triangle, parallel to another side, bisects the third side.
More formally: If in $\triangle ABC$, E is the mid-point of side $\overline{AB}$ and a line is drawn through E parallel to side $\overline{BC}$, then this line intersects side $\overline{AC}$ at its mid-point F.
Proof

Given:
A triangle $\triangle ABC$.
E is the mid-point of side $\overline{AB}$.
A line passes through E, parallel to $\overline{BC}$, and intersects $\overline{AC}$ at point F ($EF \parallel BC$).
To Prove:
F is the mid-point of $\overline{AC}$ (i.e., $AF = FC$).
Construction:
Draw a line through vertex C parallel to $\overline{AB}$ ($CD \parallel AB$). Extend the line segment $\overline{EF}$ to intersect this parallel line at point D.
Proof:
Consider the quadrilateral EBCD. By construction, we have $CD \parallel AB$. Since E is a point on $\overline{AB}$, we can say $CD \parallel EB$.
We are given that the line through E is parallel to $\overline{BC}$. Since F lies on ED (part of the extended line through E parallel to BC), we can say $ED \parallel BC$.
So, in quadrilateral EBCD, both pairs of opposite sides are parallel: $\overline{CD} \parallel \overline{EB}$ and $\overline{ED} \parallel \overline{BC}$. Therefore, EBCD is a parallelogram.
In a parallelogram, opposite sides are equal in length. Thus, the opposite sides $\overline{CD}$ and $\overline{EB}$ must be equal:
CD = EB
(Opposite sides of parallelogram EBCD) ... (1)
We are given that E is the mid-point of side $\overline{AB}$. This means:
AE = EB
(Given)
From equation (1) and the fact that $AE = EB$, we can equate AE and CD:
AE = CD
Now, let's consider $\triangle AEF$ and $\triangle CDF$.
Since $AB \parallel CD$ (as $EB$ is part of $AB$ and $EB \parallel CD$) and $\overline{AC}$ is a transversal, the alternate interior angles formed are equal:
$\angle EAF = \angle DCF$
(Alternate interior angles, $AB \parallel CD$) ... (2)
(Note: $\angle EAF$ is $\angle BAC$, and $\angle DCF$ is $\angle ACD$)
The angles $\angle AFE$ and $\angle CFD$ are formed by the intersection of lines $\overline{AD}$ and $\overline{AC}$. These are vertically opposite angles.
$\angle AFE = \angle CFD$
(Vertically opposite angles) ... (3)
We have already shown that:
AE = CD
(Proved above) ... (4)
From (2), (3), and (4), by the AAS (Angle-Angle-Side) congruence criterion (Angle $\angle EAF$, Angle $\angle AFE$, and side AE), we can conclude that:
$\triangle AEF \cong \triangle CDF$
Since the triangles are congruent, their corresponding parts are equal by CPCT:
AF = CF
This equality $AF = CF$ means that point F divides the side $\overline{AC}$ into two equal segments. Therefore, F is the mid-point of the side $\overline{AC}$.
Hence, the converse of the Mid-Point Theorem is proved.
Applications of the Mid-Point Theorem
The Mid-Point Theorem and its Converse are powerful tools in geometry, frequently used to prove geometric properties, establish relationships between line segments, and solve problems involving midpoints and parallel lines in triangles and quadrilaterals. Here are some common applications:
1. Proving Properties of Quadrilaterals
A significant application of the Mid-Point Theorem is in proving that the quadrilateral formed by joining the midpoints of the sides of any quadrilateral (taken in order) is always a parallelogram.
Example 1. Show that the line segments joining the mid-points of the sides of a quadrilateral ABCD form a parallelogram.

Answer:
Given:
A quadrilateral ABCD.
P, Q, R, and S are the mid-points of sides $\overline{AB}$, $\overline{BC}$, $\overline{CD}$, and $\overline{DA}$ respectively.
To Prove:
PQRS is a parallelogram.
Construction:
Join the diagonal $\overline{AC}$.
Proof:
Consider $\triangle ABC$.
P is the mid-point of $\overline{AB}$ and Q is the mid-point of $\overline{BC}$.
By the Mid-Point Theorem applied to $\triangle ABC$:
$\overline{PQ} \parallel \overline{AC}$ and $PQ = \frac{1}{2} AC$
... (i)
Now consider $\triangle ADC$.
S is the mid-point of $\overline{DA}$ and R is the mid-point of $\overline{DC}$.
By the Mid-Point Theorem applied to $\triangle ADC$:
$\overline{SR} \parallel \overline{AC}$ and $SR = \frac{1}{2} AC$
... (ii)
From statement (i) and statement (ii):
- Since $\overline{PQ} \parallel \overline{AC}$ and $\overline{SR} \parallel \overline{AC}$, lines parallel to the same line are parallel to each other. Thus, $\overline{PQ} \parallel \overline{SR}$.
- Since $PQ = \frac{1}{2} AC$ and $SR = \frac{1}{2} AC$, by substitution, $PQ = SR$.
Now, consider the quadrilateral PQRS. We have shown that one pair of opposite sides, $\overline{PQ}$ and $\overline{SR}$, are both equal in length ($PQ = SR$) and parallel ($\overline{PQ} \parallel \overline{SR}$).
A quadrilateral in which one pair of opposite sides is both equal and parallel is a parallelogram (Converse of a property of parallelogram).
Therefore, PQRS is a parallelogram.
Further results:
We could have similarly joined the diagonal $\overline{BD}$ and applied the Mid-Point Theorem to $\triangle ABD$ and $\triangle CBD$ to prove that $\overline{PS} \parallel \overline{BD}$ and $PS = \frac{1}{2} BD$, and $\overline{QR} \parallel \overline{BD}$ and $QR = \frac{1}{2} BD$. This would lead to $PS \parallel QR$ and $PS = QR$, which also proves that PQRS is a parallelogram.
The specific type of parallelogram PQRS depends on the original quadrilateral ABCD:
- If ABCD is a rectangle, PQRS is a rhombus.
- If ABCD is a rhombus, PQRS is a rectangle.
- If ABCD is a square, PQRS is a square.
- If ABCD is an isosceles trapezium, PQRS is a rhombus.
2. Solving Geometric Problems
The theorem is frequently used to calculate unknown lengths of segments or to prove lines are parallel in geometric problems where midpoints are given.
Example 2. In $\triangle ABC$, D, E, and F are respectively the mid-points of sides AB, BC, and CA. If $AB = 7$ cm, $BC = 8$ cm, and $CA = 9$ cm, find the perimeter of $\triangle DEF$.

Answer:
Given:
In $\triangle ABC$, D, E, and F are the mid-points of $\overline{AB}$, $\overline{BC}$, and $\overline{CA}$ respectively.
$AB = 7$ cm, $BC = 8$ cm, $CA = 9$ cm.
To Find:
The perimeter of $\triangle DEF$.
Solution:
We can apply the Mid-Point Theorem to relate the sides of $\triangle DEF$ to the sides of $\triangle ABC$.
- Since D and E are the mid-points of $\overline{AB}$ and $\overline{BC}$ respectively, by the Mid-Point Theorem, $\overline{DE} \parallel \overline{AC}$ and $DE = \frac{1}{2} AC$.
- Since E and F are the mid-points of $\overline{BC}$ and $\overline{CA}$ respectively, by the Mid-Point Theorem, $\overline{EF} \parallel \overline{AB}$ and $EF = \frac{1}{2} AB$.
- Since F and D are the mid-points of $\overline{CA}$ and $\overline{AB}$ respectively, by the Mid-Point Theorem, $\overline{FD} \parallel \overline{BC}$ and $FD = \frac{1}{2} BC$.
Now, we substitute the given side lengths of $\triangle ABC$ to find the lengths of the sides of $\triangle DEF$:
DE = $\frac{1}{2} \times CA = \frac{1}{2} \times 9 = 4.5$ cm.
EF = $\frac{1}{2} \times AB = \frac{1}{2} \times 7 = 3.5$ cm.
FD = $\frac{1}{2} \times BC = \frac{1}{2} \times 8 = 4.0$ cm.
The perimeter of $\triangle DEF$ is the sum of the lengths of its sides:
Perimeter($\triangle DEF$) = $DE + EF + FD$
Perimeter($\triangle DEF$) = $4.5 + 3.5 + 4.0$
Perimeter($\triangle DEF$) = $12.0$ cm.
Thus, the perimeter of $\triangle DEF$ is 12 cm.
Alternate Method:
We can also find the perimeter of $\triangle ABC$ first:
Perimeter($\triangle ABC$) = $AB + BC + CA = 7 + 8 + 9 = 24$ cm.
From the application of the Mid-Point Theorem, we found that $DE = \frac{1}{2} AC$, $EF = \frac{1}{2} AB$, and $FD = \frac{1}{2} BC$.
So, Perimeter($\triangle DEF$) = $DE + EF + FD = \frac{1}{2} AC + \frac{1}{2} AB + \frac{1}{2} BC = \frac{1}{2} (AC + AB + BC)$
Perimeter($\triangle DEF$) = $\frac{1}{2} \times$ Perimeter($\triangle ABC$).
Perimeter($\triangle DEF$) = $\frac{1}{2} \times 24 = 12$ cm.
Both methods yield the same result.
3. Relation to the Intercept Theorem
The Converse of the Mid-Point Theorem is actually a special case of a more general theorem known as the Intercept Theorem (also sometimes called Thales's Theorem, distinct from the Basic Proportionality Theorem). The Intercept Theorem states that if three or more parallel lines cut off equal intercepts on a transversal, then they cut off equal intercepts on any other transversal.
In the Converse of the Mid-Point Theorem, we have two parallel lines ($EF \parallel BC$) and a transversal ($\overline{AC}$) that is cut by these two parallel lines. The theorem essentially implies that if a third line parallel to these two lines and passing through the midpoint of the other transversal ($\overline{AB}$) exists, then it will also cut off equal intercepts on $\overline{AC}$. However, the more direct connection is seeing the converse as a special case of the Intercept Theorem where you have three parallel lines (BC, EF, and the construction line CD parallel to AB) and two transversals (AC and BD).